Evaluation Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click Here for More Information

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rossman, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, B. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rossman, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, B. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Evaluation Review, Vol. 9, No. 5, 627-643 (1985)
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8500900505

Numbers and Words

Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in a Single Large-Scale Evaluation Study

Gretchen B. Rossman

Research for Better Schools, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Bruce L. Wilson

Research for Better Schools, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

This article discusses how quantitative and qualitative methods can be combined in a single evaluation study to better understand the phenomenon in question. Three perspectives on combining methods are reviewed: the purist approach where the two methods are seen as mutually exclusive, the situationalist approach that views them as separate but equal, and the pragmatist approach that suggests integration is possible. From the pragmatist position it is argued that either method can be used at the analysis stage to corroborate (provide convergence in findings), elaborate (provide richness and detail), or initiate (offer new interpretations) findings from the other method. Specific examples of how results from each method can inform the other are offered.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Librarianship and Information ScienceHome page
A. K. Shenton
Use of school resource centre-based computers in leisure time by teenage pupils
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, June 1, 2008; 40(2): 123 - 137.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
S. Mendlinger and J. Cwikel
Spiraling Between Qualitative and Quantitative Data on Women's Health Behaviors: A Double Helix Model for Mixed Methods
Qual Health Res, February 1, 2008; 18(2): 280 - 293.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Mixed Methods ResearchHome page
R. B. Johnson, A. J. Onwuegbuzie, and L. A. Turner
Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research
Journal of Mixed Methods Research, April 1, 2007; 1(2): 112 - 133.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Field MethodsHome page
N. V. Ivankova, J. W. Creswell, and S. L. Stick
Using Mixed-Methods Sequential Explanatory Design: From Theory to Practice
Field Methods, February 1, 2006; 18(1): 3 - 20.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
A. Muraco
Heterosexual evaluations of hypothetical friendship behavior based on sex and sexual orientation
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, October 1, 2005; 22(5): 587 - 605.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Librarianship and Information ScienceHome page
A. K. Shenton and P. Dixon
Models of young people's information seeking
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, March 1, 2003; 35(1): 5 - 22.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
A. McConney, A. Rudd, and R. Ayres
Getting to the Bottom Line: A Method for Synthesizing Findings Within Mixed-method Program Evaluations
American Journal of Evaluation, June 1, 2002; 23(2): 121 - 140.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Child MaltreatHome page
L. A. Fontes, M. Cruz, and J. Tabachnick
Views of Child Sexual Abuse in Two Cultural Communities: An Exploratory Study among African Americans and Latinos
Child Maltreat, May 1, 2001; 6(2): 103 - 117.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Early InterventionHome page
S. Li, J. M. Marquart, and C. Zercher
Conceptual Issues and Analytic Strategies in Mixed-Method Studies of Preschool Inclusion
Journal of Early Intervention, April 1, 2000; 23(2): 116 - 132.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The Counseling PsychologistHome page
K. H. Poasa, B. Mallinckrodt, and L. A. Suzuki
Causal Attributions for Problematic Family Interactions: A Qualitative, Cultural Comparison of Western Samoa, American Samoa, and the United States
The Counseling Psychologist, January 1, 2000; 28(1): 32 - 60.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
D. L. Morgan
Practical Strategies for Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Applications to Health Research
Qual Health Res, May 1, 1998; 8(3): 362 - 376.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
J. Gaber and S. L. Gaber
Utilizing Mixed-Method Research Designs in Planning: The Case of 14th Street, New York City
Journal of Planning Education and Research, December 1, 1997; 17(2): 95 - 103.
[Abstract]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
A. A. O'Connell, L. Bol, and S. C. Langley
Evaluation Issues and Strategies for Community-Based Organizations Developing Women's HIV Prevention Programs
Eval Health Prof, December 1, 1997; 20(4): 428 - 454.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
M. Waysman and R. Savaya
Mixed Method Evaluation: A Case Study
American Journal of Evaluation, February 1, 1997; 18(1): 227 - 237.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
A. Goddard and J. Powell
Using Naturalistic and Economic Evaluation To Assist Service Planning: A Case Study in the United Kingdom
Eval Rev, August 1, 1994; 18(4): 472 - 492.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
J. W. Carey
Linking Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Integrating Cultural Factors into Public Health
Qual Health Res, August 1, 1993; 3(3): 298 - 318.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSISHome page
V. J. Caracelli and J. C. Greene
Data Analysis Strategies for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, January 1, 1993; 15(2): 195 - 207.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
M. Leininger
Current Issues, Problems, and Trends to Advance Qualitative Paradigmatic Research Methods for the Future
Qual Health Res, November 1, 1992; 2(4): 392 - 415.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Academy of Marketing ScienceHome page
S. J. Grove and R. P. Fisk
Observational Data Collection Methods for Services Marketing: An Overview
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, June 1, 1992; 20(3): 217 - 224.
[Abstract]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSISHome page
J. C. Greene, V. J. Caracelli, and W. F. Graham
Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, January 1, 1989; 11(3): 255 - 274.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
W. A. FIRESTONE
Meaning in Method: The Rhetoric of Quantitative and Qualitative Research
Educational Researcher, October 1, 1987; 16(7): 16 - 21.
[Abstract] [PDF]