|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
A Comparison of Web-Based and Paper-Based Survey MethodsTesting Assumptions of Survey Mode and Response Cost
Corey Greenlaw
Fresno County Office of Education
Sharon Brown-Welty
California State University, Fresno, sharonb{at}csufresno.edu
Web-based surveys have become more prevalent in areas such as evaluation, research, and marketing research to name a few. The proliferation of these online surveys raises the question, how do response rates compare with traditional surveys and at what cost? This research explored response rates and costs for Web-based surveys, paper surveys, and mixed-mode surveys. The participants included evaluators from the American Evaluation Association (AEA). Results included that mixed-mode, while more expensive, had higher response rates.
Key Words: Web-based surveys response rates online surveys mixed-mode surveys survey costs
References
- Archer, Thomas M. 2003. Web-based surveys. Journal of Extension 41:1-5.
- Carini, Robert M., John Hayek, George Kuh, John Kennedy, and Judith Ouimet. 2003. College student responses to web and paper surveys: Does mode matter? Research in Higher Education 44:1-19.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Cobanoglu, Cihan, Bill Warde, and Patrick Moreo. 2001. A comparison of mail, fax, and web-based survey methods. International Journal of Market Research 43:441-52.
- Converse, Patrick D., Edward Wolfe, Xiaoting Huang, and Fredrick Oswald. 2008. Response rates for mixed-mode surveys using mail and e-mail/web. American Journal of Evaluation 29:99-107.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Cook, Colleen, Fred Heath, and Russel L. Thompson. 2000. A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or internet-based surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement 60:821-36.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Dillman, Donald A. 2000. Mail and internet surveys: The Tailored Design method. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- Groves, Robert M., Eleanor Singer, and Amy Corning. 2000. Leverage-saliency theory of survey participation: Description and an illustration. Public Opinion Quarterly 64:299-308.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Groves, Robert M., Stanley Presser, and Sarah Dipko. 2004. The role of topic interest in survey participation decisions. Public Opinion Quarterly 68:2-31.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Heberlein, Thomas, and Robert Baumgartner. 1978. Factors affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires: A quantitative analysis of the published literature. American Sociological Review 43:447-62.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Idleman, Lynda. 2003. Comparing responses to mail and web-based surveys. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April 21-25 in Chicago, IL.
- Kaplowitz, Michael, Timothy Hadlock, and Ralph Levine. 2004. A comparison of web and mail survey response rates. Public Opinion Quarterly 68:94-101.[Free Full Text]
- Kiernan, Nancy Ellen, Michaela Kiernan, Mary Ann Oyler, and Carolyn Gilles. 2005. Is a web survey as effective as a mail survey? A field experiment among computer users. American Journal of Evaluation 26:245-52.[Abstract]
- Krosnick, Jon A. 1999. Survey research. Annual Review of Psychology 50:537-67.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- McCabe, Sean Esteban. 2004. Comparison of web and mail surveys in collecting illicit drug use data: A randomized experiment. Journal of Drug Education 34:61-72.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Mertler, Craig. 2003. What... another survey? Patterns of response and nonresponse from teachers to traditional and web surveys. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association, October 15-18 in Columbus, OH.
- Occupational Outlook Handbook. 2006. Bureau of Labor Statistics http://www.bls.gov/oco/home.htm (accessed April 2, 2006).
- Paolo, Anthony M., Giulia Bonaminio, Cheryl Gibson, Ty Partridge, and Ken Kallail. 2000. Response rate comparisons of e-mail and mail-distributed student evaluations. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 12:81-4.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Sax, Linda J., Shannon Gillmartin, and Alyssa Bryant. 2003. Assessing response rates and nonresponse bias in web and paper surveys. Research in Higher Education 44:409-32.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Schonlau, Mathias, Ronald Fricker, and Marc Elliott. 2002. Conducting research surveys via e-mail and the web. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
- Shannon, David, and Carol Bradshaw. 2002. A comparison of response rate, response time, and costs of mail and electronic surveys. The Journal of Experimental Education 70:179-92.
- Shannon, David, Todd Johnson, Shelby Searcy, and Alan Lott. 2002. Using electronic surveys: Advice from survey professionals. Practical Assessment, Records and Evaluation. http://pareonline.net/htm/v8n/htm (accessed June 19, 2009).
- Sheehan, Kim. 2001. E-mail survey response rates: A review. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 6:1-20.
- Sun, Anji, and Randy McClanahan. 2003. Is newer better: A comparison of web and paper-pencil survey administration modes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Research Association, April 21-25, in Chicago, IL.
This version was published on October
1, 2009
Evaluation Review, Vol. 33, No. 5,
464-480 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X09340214

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
|
|