Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kerr, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lam, T. C.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kerr, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lam, T. C.M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Measuring Program Implementation with a Classroom Observation Instrument

The Interactive Teaching Map

Douglas M. Kerr

University of Washington

Lori Kent

University of Virginia

Tony C.M. Lam

University of Washington Interface Counsultants, Inc.

We present a classroom observation instrument (the Interactive Teaching Map) designed to measure implementation of a comprehensive educational program targeting classroom teaching strategies. Procedures for using the Interactive Teaching Map to collect data and to construct reliable measures of program implementation and outcome are described. It is argued that implementation analysis that incorporates measures constructed from classroom observation data can add to traditional experimental-control group comparison designs for assessing program effectiveness in diverse field settings and for providing formative feedback to program staff.

Evaluation Review, Vol. 9, No. 4, 461-482 (1985)
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8500900405
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
J. D. Hawkins, R. Kosterman, R. F. Catalano, K. G. Hill, and R. D. Abbott
Promoting Positive Adult Functioning Through Social Development Intervention in Childhood: Long-term Effects From the Seattle Social Development Project
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, January 1, 2005; 159(1): 25 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
H. S. Lonczak, R. D. Abbott, J. D. Hawkins, R. Kosterman, and R. F. Catalano
Effects of the Seattle Social Development Project on Sexual Behavior, Pregnancy, Birth, and Sexually Transmitted Disease Outcomes by Age 21 Years
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, May 1, 2002; 156(5): 438 - 447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
J. D. Hawkins, R. F. Catalano, R. Kosterman, R. Abbott, and K. G. Hill
Preventing Adolescent Health-Risk Behaviors by Strengthening Protection During Childhood
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, March 1, 1999; 153(3): 226 - 234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am Educ Res JHome page
J. D. Hawkins, H. J. Doueck, and D. M. Lishner
Changing Teaching Practices in Mainstream Classrooms to Improve Bonding and Behavior of Low Achievers
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1988; 25(1): 31 - 50.
[Abstract] [PDF]