Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bickman, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bickman, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Improving Established Statewide Programs

A Component Theory of Evaluation

Leonard Bickman

Peabody College of Vanderbilt University

This article describes an approach to evaluation that grew out of the need to develop a system that would first describe and then assess statewide services delivered to preschool children. Based on evaluability assessment, the component theory conceptualizes the unit of analysis for evaluation as the component and not the entire program. It is argued that this approach increases the generalizability and utilization of evaluations as well as enhancing the ability to evaluate many existing programs at the state level. An application of the approach to evaluating preschool intervention programs is discussed.

Evaluation Review, Vol. 9, No. 2, 189-208 (1985)
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8500900206


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
S. R. Rosas
Concept Mapping as a Technique for Program Theory Development: An Illustration Using Family Support Programs
American Journal of Evaluation, September 1, 2005; 26(3): 389 - 401.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
S. Sidani and L. Sechrest
Putting Program Theory into Operation
American Journal of Evaluation, June 1, 1999; 20(2): 227 - 238.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
L. Bickman
Implications for Evaluators from the Fort Bragg Evaluation 1
American Journal of Evaluation, February 1, 1996; 17(1): 57 - 74.
[Abstract] [PDF]