Evaluation Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click Here for More Information

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Darcy, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Darcy, R. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Evaluation Review, Vol. 8, No. 4, 573-582 (1984)
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8400800407

Policy Implications of Using Significance Tests in Evaluation Research

Anne L. Schneider

Oklahoma State University

Robert E. Darcy

Oklahoma State University

Significance tests have certain normative implications that are not commonly recognized and present serious complications for evaluation research. One of the conclusions reached in this article is that evaluators often make normative decisions, albeit unintentionally, when they use the traditional .05 significance level in studies with small numbers of cases. Another conclusion, however, is that evaluators cannot abandon significance tests, but should use and interpret them differently than in conventional social science research.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Early InterventionHome page
S. Pedersen
Effect Sizes and "What If" Analyses as Supplements to Statistical Significance Tests
Journal of Early Intervention, January 1, 2003; 25(4): 310 - 319.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Hum LactHome page
P. J. Martens
Increasing Breastfeeding Initiation and Duration at a Community Level: An Evaluation of Sagkeeng First Nation's Community Health Nurse and Peer Counselor Programs
J Hum Lact, August 1, 2002; 18(3): 236 - 246.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Early InterventionHome page
P. Snyder
Guidelines for Reporting Results of Group Quantitative Investigations
Journal of Early Intervention, January 1, 2000; 23(3): 145 - 150.
[PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
S. A. Gilham, W. L. Lucas, and D. Sivewright
The Impact of Drug Education and Prevention Programs: Disparity Between Impressionistic and Empirical Assessments
Eval Rev, October 1, 1997; 21(5): 589 - 613.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
B. Thompson
Exploring the Replicability of a Study's Results: Bootstrap Statistics for the Multivariate Case
Educational and Psychological Measurement, February 1, 1995; 55(1): 84 - 94.
[Abstract]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
B. Thompson
Book Reviews
Educational and Psychological Measurement, December 1, 1991; 51(4): 1069 - 1075.



Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
L. G. Daniel
Book Reviews
Educational and Psychological Measurement, September 1, 1990; 50(3): 710 - 716.