Evaluation Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click Here for More Information

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Graham, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Collins, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Graham, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Collins, L. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Evaluation Review, Vol. 8, No. 2, 247-260 (1984)
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8400800206


Other

Group Comparability

A Multiattribute Utility Measurement Approach to the Use of Random Assignment with Small Numbers of Aggregated Units

John W. Graham

Health Behavior Research Institute University of Southern California

Brian R. Flay

Health Behavior Research Institute University of Southern California

C. Anderson Johnson

Health Behavior Research Institute University of Southern California

William B. Hansen

Health Behavior Research Institute University of Southern California

Linda M. Collins

Health Behavior Research Institute University of Southern California

It is not always possible, especially in large-scale evaluation research, to ensure that random assignment will produce groups that are comparable on any number of potentially important factors. Typically, gaining comparability has been achieved only at the expense of random assignment. A method is presented that allows multivariate comparability while making only minimal restrictions on randomization. The procedure is demonstrated in the context of assigning 63 aggregated units (schools) to 28 experimental and control conditions. Good comparability of groups for all primary main effects and interactions was venfied for 15 individual variables.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. A. Johnson, S. Cen, P. Gallaher, P. H. Palmer, L. Xiao, A. Ritt-Olson, and J. B. Unger
Why Smoking Prevention Programs Sometimes Fail. Does Effectiveness Depend on Sociocultural Context and Individual Characteristics?
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2007; 16(6): 1043 - 1049.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
M. L. Hecht and J. L. R. Krieger
The Principle of Cultural Grounding in School-Based Substance Abuse Prevention: The Drug Resistance Strategies Project
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, September 1, 2006; 25(3): 301 - 319.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social ScienceHome page
B. R. Flay and L. M. Collins
Historical Review of School-Based Randomized Trials for Evaluating Problem Behavior Prevention Programs
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, May 1, 2005; 599(1): 115 - 146.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
E. Segawa, J. E. Ngwe, Y. Li, B. R. Flay, and Aban Aya Coinvestigators
Evaluation of the Effects of the Aban Aya Youth Project in Reducing Violence among African American Adolescent Males Using Latent Class Growth Mixture Modeling Techniques
Eval Rev, April 1, 2005; 29(2): 128 - 148.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin TrialsHome page
L. H Moulton
Covariate-based constrained randomization of group-randomized trials
Clinical Trials, June 1, 2004; 1(3): 297 - 305.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
B. R. Flay, S. Graumlich, E. Segawa, J. L. Burns, and M. Y. Holliday
Effects of 2 Prevention Programs on High-Risk Behaviors Among African American Youth: A Randomized Trial
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, April 1, 2004; 158(4): 377 - 384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
T. W. Valente, B. R. Hoffman, A. Ritt-Olson, K. Lichtman, and C. A. Johnson
Effects of a Social-Network Method for Group Assignment Strategies on Peer-Led Tobacco Prevention Programs in Schools
Am J Public Health, November 1, 2003; 93(11): 1837 - 1843.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
S. Sussman and A. W. Stacy
Five Methods of Assessing School-Level Daily Use of Cigarettes and Alcohol By Adolescents At Continuation High Schools
Eval Rev, December 1, 1994; 18(6): 741 - 755.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
C. W. Dent, S. Sussman, and B. R. Flay
The Use of Archival Data To Select and Assign Schools in a Drug Prevention Trial
Eval Rev, April 1, 1993; 17(2): 159 - 181.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
M. A. Pentz, E. A. Trebow, W. B. Hansen, D. P. MacKinnon, J. H. Dwyer, C. A. Johnson, B. R. Flay, S. Daniels, and C. Cormack
Effects of Program Implementation on Adolescent Drug Use Behavior: The Midwestern Prevention Project (MPP)
Eval Rev, June 1, 1990; 14(3): 264 - 289.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
J. D. Killen, T. N. Robinson, M. J. Telch, K. E. Saylor, D. J. Maron, T. Rich, and S. Bryson
The Stanford Adolescent Heart Health Program
Health Educ Behav, January 1, 1989; 16(2): 263 - 283.
[PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN EDUCATIONHome page
J. D. Killen and T. N. Robinson
Chapter 4: School-Based Research on Health Behavior Change: The Stanford Adolescent Heart Health Program as a Model for Cardiovascular Disease Risk Reduction
Review of Research in Education, January 1, 1988; 15(1): 171 - 200.
[PDF]