|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Evaluation Review, Vol. 8, No. 2,
247-260 (1984)
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8400800206
Group Comparability
A Multiattribute Utility Measurement Approach to the Use of Random Assignment with Small Numbers of Aggregated Units
John W. Graham
Health Behavior Research Institute University of Southern California
Brian R. Flay
Health Behavior Research Institute University of Southern California
C. Anderson Johnson
Health Behavior Research Institute University of Southern California
William B. Hansen
Health Behavior Research Institute University of Southern California
Linda M. Collins
Health Behavior Research Institute University of Southern California
It is not always possible, especially in large-scale evaluation research, to ensure that random assignment will produce groups that are comparable on any number of potentially important factors. Typically, gaining comparability has been achieved only at the expense of random assignment. A method is presented that allows multivariate comparability while making only minimal restrictions on randomization. The procedure is demonstrated in the context of assigning 63 aggregated units (schools) to 28 experimental and control conditions. Good comparability of groups for all primary main effects and interactions was venfied for 15 individual variables.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. A. Johnson, S. Cen, P. Gallaher, P. H. Palmer, L. Xiao, A. Ritt-Olson, and J. B. Unger
Why Smoking Prevention Programs Sometimes Fail. Does Effectiveness Depend on Sociocultural Context and Individual Characteristics?
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.,
June 1, 2007;
16(6):
1043 - 1049.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. L. Hecht and J. L. R. Krieger
The Principle of Cultural Grounding in School-Based Substance Abuse Prevention: The Drug Resistance Strategies Project
Journal of Language and Social Psychology,
September 1, 2006;
25(3):
301 - 319.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. R. Flay and L. M. Collins
Historical Review of School-Based Randomized Trials for Evaluating Problem Behavior Prevention Programs
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,
May 1, 2005;
599(1):
115 - 146.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Segawa, J. E. Ngwe, Y. Li, B. R. Flay, and Aban Aya Coinvestigators
Evaluation of the Effects of the Aban Aya Youth Project in Reducing Violence among African American Adolescent Males Using Latent Class Growth Mixture Modeling Techniques
Eval Rev,
April 1, 2005;
29(2):
128 - 148.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. H Moulton
Covariate-based constrained randomization of group-randomized trials
Clinical Trials,
June 1, 2004;
1(3):
297 - 305.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. R. Flay, S. Graumlich, E. Segawa, J. L. Burns, and M. Y. Holliday
Effects of 2 Prevention Programs on High-Risk Behaviors Among African American Youth: A Randomized Trial
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med,
April 1, 2004;
158(4):
377 - 384.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. W. Valente, B. R. Hoffman, A. Ritt-Olson, K. Lichtman, and C. A. Johnson
Effects of a Social-Network Method for Group Assignment Strategies on Peer-Led Tobacco Prevention Programs in Schools
Am J Public Health,
November 1, 2003;
93(11):
1837 - 1843.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Sussman and A. W. Stacy
Five Methods of Assessing School-Level Daily Use of Cigarettes and Alcohol By Adolescents At Continuation High Schools
Eval Rev,
December 1, 1994;
18(6):
741 - 755.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. W. Dent, S. Sussman, and B. R. Flay
The Use of Archival Data To Select and Assign Schools in a Drug Prevention Trial
Eval Rev,
April 1, 1993;
17(2):
159 - 181.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Pentz, E. A. Trebow, W. B. Hansen, D. P. MacKinnon, J. H. Dwyer, C. A. Johnson, B. R. Flay, S. Daniels, and C. Cormack
Effects of Program Implementation on Adolescent Drug Use Behavior: The Midwestern Prevention Project (MPP)
Eval Rev,
June 1, 1990;
14(3):
264 - 289.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. D. Killen, T. N. Robinson, M. J. Telch, K. E. Saylor, D. J. Maron, T. Rich, and S. Bryson
The Stanford Adolescent Heart Health Program
Health Educ Behav,
January 1, 1989;
16(2):
263 - 283.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. D. Killen and T. N. Robinson
Chapter 4: School-Based Research on Health Behavior Change: The Stanford Adolescent Heart Health Program as a Model for Cardiovascular Disease Risk Reduction
Review of Research in Education,
January 1, 1988;
15(1):
171 - 200.
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|