This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Heilman, J. G. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Heilman, J. G. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Beyond the Technical and Bureaucratic Theories of Utilization

Some Thoughts on Synthesizing Reviews and the Knowledge Base of the Evaluation Profession

Auburn University

Technical and bureaucratic considerations frame current theories of utilization. These theorees distract attention from the range of broad substantive knowledge evaluators have generated. Two proposals recognize that this knowledge reservoir can help promote use if its contents are properly organized; both, however, have limitations. Data synthesis assumes scores of statistically comparable studies. Social problem study groups are not well-designed for making the knowledge frontiers they define generally accessible. This article suggests supplementing these approaches to building knowledge with an increased emphasis on synthesizing reviews. Even though such reviews currently enjoy modest status at best, they serve to strengthen the profession and promote utilization.

Evaluation Review, Vol. 7, No. 6, 707-728 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8300700601


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?