This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Peck, D. L. Articles by Rubin, H. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Peck, D. L. Articles by Rubin, H. J. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Bureaucratic Needs and Evaluation Research

A Case Study of the Department of Housing and Urban Development

The University of Alabama

Herbert J. Rubin

Center for Governmental Studies Northern Illinois University

Participant observation supplemented by case study material on the activities of a federal research and program evaluation office are described. The focus is how organizational imperatives and government rules for research dominate in-house evaluations of government sponsored programs. The authors suggest that organizational imperatives give rise to a research orientation that promotes the use of inappropriate research methodologies, collection of inadequate data sets, and expedient program evaluations. The authors conclude that creation of research reports based on the gathering of data may be overshadowed by an inappropriate characterization of some government sponsored social service programs. Suggestions for amelioration of such problems, as these relate to the organizational position of the evaluation research office, are provided.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Hennessy and M. J. Sullivan Good Organizational Reasons for Bad Evaluation Research American Journal of Evaluation, November 1, 1989; 10(4): 41 - 50. [PDF]