| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8300700503 Assessing Mental Health Program EffectivenessA Comparison of Three Client Follow-Up MethodsUniversity of Denver
University of Nebraska at Lincoln
University of Denver
University of Denver In order to assess the advantages and disadvantages of face-to-face interviews, telephone interviews, and mailed questionnaires, 1100 clients were randomly assigned to one of these follow-up methods. All participating clients were contacted approximately 180 days after intake using a well-documented treatment outcome measure. Response rates for the telephone interview and mailed questionnaire were approximately one-half as high as the face-to-face interview, yet for each method very few client background variables were related to whether or not clients responded. The mailed questionnaire was least affected by socially desirable responses, and also cost less to administer than either of the interview methods.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||

