Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clear, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gallagher, K. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Clear, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gallagher, K. W.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Screening Devices in Probation and Parole

Management Problems

Todd R. Clear

Rutgers University

Kenneth W. Gallagher

Rutgers University

Offender screeningfor classification has become increasngly popular in correctionalfield services. The most common approach uses objective risk and need scales to classify offenders, a strategy designated as "model" by the National Institute of Corrections. However, adoption of this system raises managerial problems, especially concerning selection of scale cutoffs and adoption of supervision standards. The significance of these problems is illustrated in this article by data from several organizations currently engaged in offender screening.

Evaluation Review, Vol. 7, No. 2, 217-234 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8300700204
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Crime DelinquencyHome page
P. M. Harris, R. Gingerich, and T. A. Whittaker
The "Effectiveness" of Differential Supervision
Crime Delinquency, April 1, 2004; 50(2): 235 - 271.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Crime DelinquencyHome page
P. M. Harris
Client Management Classification and Prediction of Probation Outcome
Crime Delinquency, April 1, 1994; 40(2): 154 - 174.
[Abstract]

Home page
 The Prison JournalHome page
T. R. CLEAR, V. B. CLEAR, and A. A. BRAGA
Correctional Alternatives for Drug Offenders in an Era of Overcrowding
The Prison Journal, June 1, 1993; 73(2): 178 - 198.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Crime DelinquencyHome page
J. R. Maupin
Risk Classification Systems and the Provision of Juvenile Aftercare
Crime Delinquency, January 1, 1993; 39(1): 90 - 105.
[Abstract]