Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heimendinger, J.
Right arrow Articles by Laird, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Heimendinger, J.
Right arrow Articles by Laird, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Growth Changes

Measuring the Effect of an Intervention

Jerianne Heimendinger

Department of Health, State of Rhode Island

Nan Laird

Harvard School of Public Health

This article presents a method for disentangling (in a study population) the effects of an intervention from changes that are due to growth and regression to the mean. The basic approach is to calculate, for each subject, the expected change over time based on an initial measurement, a set of reference standards, and a set of correlations among measurements over time. The difference between the observed and expected change is attributed to the intervention. Advantages of the methodology are that we take into account both the natural growth process and regression to the mean in calculating the expected change. In addition, the methodology may be applied when no control group is available by letting standards serve as a comparison group, and retrospective measure ments of varying time intervals may be used. The method is illustrated in the context of evaluating the effect of the Special Supplemental Food Programfor Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) on infant growth.

Evaluation Review, Vol. 7, No. 1, 80-95 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8300700105


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?