Evaluation Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click Here for More Information

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sheinfeld, S. N.
Right arrow Articles by Lord, G. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sheinfeld, S. N.
Right arrow Articles by Lord, G. L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Evaluation Review, Vol. 5, No. 3, 377-391 (1981)
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8100500306

The Ethics of Evaluation Researchers

An Exploration of Value Choices

Sherri N. Sheinfeld

Hahnemann Medical College and Hospital Philadelphia

Gary L. Lord

Hahnemann Medical College and Hospital Philadelphia

This exploratory study examines (1) the values of evaluation research practitioners in response to ethical statements demanding a value choice and (2) the relationship between evaluator value choices and five hypothetical value dimensions relevant to more mature groups of professionals. Preliminary findings indicate that scaling, comparison, and analysis of evaluator value choices are feasible and may identify whatever consensus exists. Value conflicts exist among evaluation practioners, particularly around more esoteric concepts such as sharing and client loyalty versus distributive justice. The implications of multiple value conflictsfor the further growth of evaluation as a profession are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 American Journal of EvaluationHome page
L. Mabry
Circumstantial Ethics
American Journal of Evaluation, June 1, 1999; 20(2): 199 - 212.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Canadian Journal of School PsychologyHome page
J. L. Pettifor
Ethics and Social Justice in Program Evaluation: Are Evaluators Value-free?
Canadian Journal of School Psychology, January 1, 1995; 10(2): 138 - 146.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Eval RevHome page
M. Morris and R. Cohn
Program Evaluators and Ethical Challenges: A National Survey
Eval Rev, December 1, 1993; 17(6): 621 - 642.
[Abstract] [PDF]