Evaluation Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click Here for More Information

Click here for free access to the SAGE eReference platform!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Flynn, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Heal, L. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Flynn, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Heal, L. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Evaluation Review, Vol. 5, No. 3, 357-376 (1981)
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8100500305

A Short Form of Pass 3

A Study of Its Structure, Interrater Reliability, and Validity for Assessing Normalization

Robert J. Flynn

Purdue University

Laird W. Heal

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

The principle of normalization has become an internationally influential approach to planning and evaluating human services in developmental disabilities, rehabilitation, and related fields. PASS 3, the major standardized normalization-based program evaluation instrument currently in use, is now being applied in several countries to assess the quality of community residential, educational, vocational, child development, and other programs. In the present study, a short form of PASS 3 was derived and its properties assessed. The short form appears to be afeasible, cost-effective alternative to the longform in many potential evaluation and research contexts. Guidelines for field use were discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Intellect DisabilHome page
P. M. Oakes
Quest: A System of Evaluation for Residential Support Services for People with Learning Disabilities
J Intellect Disabil., March 1, 2000; 4(1): 7 - 26.
[Abstract] [PDF]