Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0193841X09335050v1
33/5/446    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cho, H.
Right arrow Articles by Hartman, S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cho, H.
Right arrow Articles by Hartman, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Influence of ‘‘No Child Left Behind’’ Legislation on Drug Prevention in U.S. Schools

Hyunsan Cho

Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, cho{at}pire.org

Denise Dion Hallfors

rPacific Institute for Research and Evaluation

Bonita J. Iritani

Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation

Shane Hartman

Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation

This study examines prevention practices and perceptions in U.S. schools since passage of federal No Child Left Behind (NCLB) legislation, using survey data from state education agencies (SEA) and a population-based sample of school districts. Only one third of U.S. public school districts rely on evidence-based prevention curriculum in middle schools. Funding from other sources and large size were positively associated with using evidence-based curricula. States and districts differed on their perceptions of high-priority activities, and neither supported the federal priority on student drug testing. The findings suggest that there is a disconnect between what NCLB says and what is funded.

Key Words: evidence-based curricula • policy evaluation • safe and drug-free school funding • substance abuse and violence prevention

This version was published on October 1, 2009

Evaluation Review, Vol. 33, No. 5, 446-463 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X09335050
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?