This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Freedman, D. A. Articles by Berk, R. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Freedman, D. A. Articles by Berk, R. A. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Weighting Regressions by Propensity Scores

University of California, Berkeley, freedman{at}stat.berkeley.edu

Richard A. Berk

University of Pennsylvania, berkr{at}sas.upenn.edu

Regressions can be weighted by propensity scores in order to reduce bias. However, weighting is likely to increase random error in the estimates, and to bias the estimated standard errors downward, even when selection mechanisms are well understood. Moreover, in some cases, weighting will increase the bias in estimated causal parameters. If investigators have a good causal model, it seems better just to fit the model without weights. If the causal model is improperly specified, there can be significant problems in retrieving the situation by weighting, although weighting may help under some circumstances.

Key Words: causation • selection • models • experiments • observational studies • regression • propensity scores

Evaluation Review, Vol. 32, No. 4, 392-409 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X08317586


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?