This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0193841X07311993v1 32/2/216    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Google Scholar Articles by Schmidt, S. R. Articles by Sonenstein, F. L. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Schmidt, S. R. Articles by Sonenstein, F. L. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Designing a Household Survey to Address Seasonality in Child Care Arrangements

U.S. Department of Education, Stefanie.Schmidt{at}ed.gov

Kevin H. Wang

RTI International

Freya L. Sonenstein

Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health

In household telephone surveys, a long field period may be required to maximize the response rate and achieve adequate sample sizes. However, long field periods can be problematic when measures of seasonally affected behavior are sought. Surveys of child care use are one example because child care arrangements vary by season. Options include varying the questions posed about school-year and summer arrangements or posing retrospective questions about child care use for the school year only. This article evaluates the bias associated with the use of retrospective questions about school-year child care arrangements in the 1999 National Survey of America's Families. The authors find little evidence of bias and hence recommend that future surveys use the retrospective approach.

Key Words: child care • seasonality • recall bias • telephone survey

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?