Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gandhi, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, C. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gandhi, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, C. H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Devil Is in the Details

Examining the Evidence for "Proven" School-Based Drug Abuse Prevention Programs

Allison Gruner Gandhi

American Institutes for Research

Erin Murphy-Graham

University of California, Berkeley

Anthony Petrosino

WestEd

Sara Schwartz Chrismer

Harvard Graduate School of Education

Carol H. Weiss

Harvard Graduate School of Education

In an effort to promote evidence-based practice, government officials, researchers, and program developers have developed lists of model programs in the prevention field. This article reviews the evidence used by seven best-practice lists to select five model prevention programs. The authors’ examination of this research raises questions about the process used to identify and publicize programs as successful. They found limited evidence showing substantial impact on drug use behavior at posttest, with very few studies showing substantial impact at longer follow-ups. The authors advocate additional long-term follow-up studies and conclude by suggesting changes in the procedures for developing best-practice lists.

Key Words: drug abuse prevention • evaluation • evidence-based policy • model programs • education

Evaluation Review, Vol. 31, No. 1, 43-74 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X06287188
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Eval RevHome page
D. M. Gorman and J. C. Huber Jr
The Social Construction of ``Evidence-Based'' Drug Prevention Programs: A Reanalysis of Data From the Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE) Program
Eval Rev, August 1, 2009; 33(4): 396 - 414.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 American Journal of EvaluationHome page
C. H. Weiss, E. Murphy-Graham, A. Petrosino, and A. G. Gandhi
The Fairy Godmother--and Her Warts: Making the Dream of Evidence-Based Policy Come True
American Journal of Evaluation, March 1, 2008; 29(1): 29 - 47.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Public HealthHome page
D. M. Gorman
Changing Service Systems for High-Risk Youth Using State-Level Strategies
Am J Public Health, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 595 - 600.
[Full Text] [PDF]