Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by León, F. R.
Right arrow Articles by Jennings, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by León, F. R.
Right arrow Articles by Jennings, V.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Challenging the Courtesy Bias Interpretation of Favorable Clients’ Perceptions of Family Planning Delivery

Federico R. León

Georgetown University Institute for Reproductive Health

Rebecka Lundgren

Georgetown University Institute for Reproductive Health

Ana Huapaya

Instituto de Salud Reproductiva, Lima, Peru

Irit Sinai

Georgetown University Institute for Reproductive Health

Victoria Jennings

Georgetown University Institute for Reproductive Health

Favorable client perceptions of provider’s interpersonal behavior in contraceptive delivery, documented in clinic exit questionnaires, appear to contradict results from qualitative evaluations and are attributed to clients’ courtesy bias. In this study, trained simulated clients requested services from Ministry of Health providers in three countries. Providers excelled in courteousness/respect in Peru and Rwanda; in India, providers were less courteous and respectful when the simulated clients chose the pill. Privacy and two-way communication were less prevalent in all three countries. The findings challenge the courtesy bias interpretation. Global results from qualitative studies may have expressed the views of the minority of clients who are not treated well by providers.

Key Words: courtesy bias • family planning delivery • service test • client exit interview

Evaluation Review, Vol. 31, No. 1, 24-42 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X06289044
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Eval Health ProfHome page
F. R. Leon, R. Lundgren, and V. Jennings
Provider Selection of Evidence-Based Contraception Guidelines in Service Provision: A Study in India, Peru, and Rwanda
Eval Health Prof, March 1, 2008; 31(1): 3 - 21.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Eval RevHome page
F. R. Leon, M. Arevalo, R. Lundgren, V. Jennings, A. Huapaya, and R. Panfichi
Four Criteria to Evaluate Providers' Service-Delivery Response to New Contraceptive Introduction
Eval Rev, August 1, 2007; 31(4): 364 - 390.
[Abstract] [PDF]