This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Vittes, K. A. Articles by Sorenson, S. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Vittes, K. A. Articles by Sorenson, S. B. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Are Temporary Restraining Orders More Likely to Be Issued When Applications Mention Firearms?

Susan B. Sorenson

School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles

Restraining orders, an important legal intervention for victims of domestic violence, have broad potential for injury prevention. Using data from one of the busiest restraining order clinics in the nation, the authors examined 1,354 applicants' descriptions of abuse. Most (89.2%) applicants were issued a restraining order. A total of 16.0% of applicants mentioned a firearm in their descriptions of abuse; doing so was not associated with restraining order issuance. About 1 in 20 applicants, even if issued a restraining order, would not be protected by the federal firearm purchase and possession prohibitions because they had not lived with or had a child with the defendant. However, the proportion of these individuals who report threatened or actual use of firearms against them is similar to that of other applicants. Federal and, when relevant, state law should be modified to include these persons.

Key Words: firearm • intimate partner violence • protective order • restraining order

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?