This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by McMorris, B. J. Articles by Catalano, R. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by McMorris, B. J. Articles by Catalano, R. F. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A Comparison of Methods to Obtain Active Parental Consent for an International Student Survey

University of Washington

Jackie Clements

Tracy Evans-Whipp

Murdoch Children’s Research Institute and University of Melbourne

Danielle Gangnes

University of Washington

Lyndal Bond

John W. Toumbourou

Murdoch Children’s Research Institute and University of Melbourne

Richard F. Catalano

University of Washington

Many school-based research efforts require active parental consent for student participation. Maximizing rates of consent form return and agreement is an important issue, because sample representativeness may be compromised when these rates are low. This article compares two methods for obtaining active parental consent: return of consent forms in the mail versus return by students to their classrooms. The methods were tested in a pilot study of 46 schools (1,058 students), with half of the schools randomly allocated to each of the alternative methods. A hierarchical nonlinear model of consent form return and agreement rates suggests that the student-delivered method is more successful at producing higher rates of consent form return and agreement to participate in the study, after controlling for school-level characteristics. The authors discuss the findings and their implications for other researchers engaged in school-based research with adolescents.

Key Words: active parent consent • random assignment • student participation • surveys • international comparison

Evaluation Review, Vol. 28, No. 1, 64-83 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X03257532


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. A. Horn, S. A. Branstetter, G. A. Dino, T. D. Jarrett, C. Tworek, and J. Zhang Potential effects of active parental consent: Enrolling teen smokers into a school-based cessation program Nicotine Tob Res, November 1, 2009; 11(11): 1359 - 1367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Hanewinkel, S. E Tanski, and J. D Sargent Author's Response Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2009; 38(5): 1413 - 1414. [Full Text] [PDF]

				F.-A. Esbensen, C. Melde, T. J. Taylor, and D. Peterson Active Parental Consent in School-Based Research: How Much Is Enough and How Do We Get It? Eval Rev, August 1, 2008; 32(4): 335 - 362. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. J. McMorris, S. A. Hemphill, J. W. Toumbourou, R. F. Catalano, and G. C. Patton Prevalence of Substance Use and Delinquent Behavior in Adolescents From Victoria, Australia and Washington State, United States Health Educ Behav, August 1, 2007; 34(4): 634 - 650. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. H. Jaycox, D. F. McCaffrey, B. W. Ocampo, G. A. Shelley, S. M. Blake, D. J. Peterson, L. S. Richmond, and J. E. Kub Challenges in the Evaluation and Implementation of School-Based Prevention and Intervention Programs on Sensitive Topics American Journal of Evaluation, September 1, 2006; 27(3): 320 - 336. [Abstract] [PDF]