This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Fletcher, L. A. Articles by Wagenaar, A. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fletcher, L. A. Articles by Wagenaar, A. C. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Handheld Computers

A Feasible Alternative to Paper Forms for Field Data Collection

Darin J. Erickson

Traci L. Toomey

Alexander C. Wagenaar

University of Minnesota

Recent advances in handheld computer hardware and software may provide alternatives to paper-based data collection methods. The authors compared data collected with paper forms to data collected with handheld computer-based forms in a field observation study of alcohol purchase attempts at 47 community festivals in a large metropolitan area. Agreement between data collected with paper forms and data collected with handheld computers was greater than 95%. Computer-based forms handled branching patterns better and yielded data that were immediately available for analyses. Paper forms handled written comments better. Handheld computers are a feasible alternative to paper forms for field data collection.

Key Words: handheld computer • data collection • data quality • PDA • palm

Evaluation Review, Vol. 27, No. 2, 165-178 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X02250527


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L.-A. Palen, J. W. Graham, E. A. Smith, L. L. Caldwell, C. Mathews, and A. J. Flisher Rates of Missing Responses in Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) Versus Paper Assessments Eval Rev, June 1, 2008; 32(3): 257 - 272. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Sana and A. A. Weinreb Insiders, Outsiders, and the Editing of Inconsistent Survey Data Sociological Methods Research, May 1, 2008; 36(4): 515 - 541. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. L. Vanden Eng, A. Wolkon, A. S. Frolov, D. J. Terlouw, M. J. Eliades, K. Morgah, V. Takpa, A. Dare, Y. K. Sodahlon, Y. Doumanou, et al. Use of Handheld Computers with Global Positioning Systems for Probability Sampling and Data Entry in Household Surveys Am J Trop Med Hyg, August 1, 2007; 77(2): 393 - 399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. C. Gravlee, S. N. Zenk, S. Woods, Z. Rowe, and A. J. Schulz Handheld Computers for Direct Observation of the Social and Physical Environment Field Methods, November 1, 2006; 18(4): 382 - 397. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. van Griensven, S. Naorat, P. H. Kilmarx, S. Jeeyapant, C. Manopaiboon, S. Chaikummao, R. A. Jenkins, W. Uthaivoravit, P. Wasinrapee, P. A. Mock, et al. Palmtop-assisted Self-Interviewing for the Collection of Sensitive Behavioral Data: Randomized Trial with Drug Use Urine Testing Am. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2006; 163(3): 271 - 278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. H. Ice Technological Advances in Observational Data Collection: The Advantages and LImitations of Computer-Assisted Data Collection Field Methods, August 1, 2004; 16(3): 352 - 375. [Abstract] [PDF]