Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pokorny, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Curie, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pokorny, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Curie, C. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Do Participation Rates Change when Active Consent Procedures Replace Passive Consent

Steven B. Pokorny

DePaul University

Leonard A. Jason

DePaul University

Michael E. Schoeny

University of Illinois at Chicago

Stephanie M. Townsend

DePaul University

Carrie J. Curie

DePaul University

Researchers face considerable ambiguity and controversy regarding the issue of informed consent. Decisions about consent procedures can affect study participation rates and prevalence estimates among specific populations. Changing from passive to active parental consent procedures was examined in a case study with an anonymous survey of sixth- through eighth-grade students' substance use. Four types of procedures for obtaining parental consent were examined. Results suggest that certain types of consent procedures can yield high levels of participation. This study also demonstrates that low participation rates with some active consent procedures can cause biases in sample characteristics and outcome data.

Evaluation Review, Vol. 25, No. 5, 567-580 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X0102500504


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nicotine Tob ResHome page
K. A. Horn, S. A. Branstetter, G. A. Dino, T. D. Jarrett, C. Tworek, and J. Zhang
Potential effects of active parental consent: Enrolling teen smokers into a school-based cessation program
Nicotine Tob Res, November 1, 2009; 11(11): 1359 - 1367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
A. V. Peterson Jr, K. A. Kealey, S. L. Mann, P. M. Marek, E. J. Ludman, J. Liu, and J. B. Bricker
Group-Randomized Trial of a Proactive, Personalized Telephone Counseling Intervention for Adolescent Smoking Cessation
J Natl Cancer Inst, October 21, 2009; 101(20): 1378 - 1392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
K. A. Kealey, E. J. Ludman, P. M. Marek, S. L. Mann, J. B. Bricker, and A. V. Peterson
Design and Implementation of an Effective Telephone Counseling Intervention for Adolescent Smoking Cessation
J Natl Cancer Inst, October 21, 2009; 101(20): 1393 - 1405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
J. P. Bergstrom, S. Partington, M. K. Murphy, L. Galvao, E. Fayram, and R. A. Cisler
Active Consent in Urban Elementary Schools: An Examination of Demographic Differences in Consent Rates
Eval Rev, October 1, 2009; 33(5): 481 - 496.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
M. W. Courser, S. R. Shamblen, P. J. Lavrakas, D. Collins, and P. Ditterline
The Impact of Active Consent Procedures on Nonresponse and Nonresponse Error in Youth Survey Data: Evidence From a New Experiment
Eval Rev, August 1, 2009; 33(4): 370 - 395.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
F.-A. Esbensen, C. Melde, T. J. Taylor, and D. Peterson
Active Parental Consent in School-Based Research: How Much Is Enough and How Do We Get It?
Eval Rev, August 1, 2008; 32(4): 335 - 362.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
L. H. Jaycox, D. F. McCaffrey, B. W. Ocampo, G. A. Shelley, S. M. Blake, D. J. Peterson, L. S. Richmond, and J. E. Kub
Challenges in the Evaluation and Implementation of School-Based Prevention and Intervention Programs on Sensitive Topics
American Journal of Evaluation, September 1, 2006; 27(3): 320 - 336.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
G. S. Burke
Looking into the Institutional Review Board: Observations from Both Sides of the Table
J. Nutr., April 1, 2005; 135(4): 921 - 924.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
T. Leakey, K. B. Lunde, K. Koga, and K. Glanz
Written Parental Consent and the Use of Incentives in a Youth Smoking Prevention Trial: A Case Study From Project SPLASH
American Journal of Evaluation, December 1, 2004; 25(4): 509 - 523.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
D. K. Eaton, R. Lowry, N. D. Brener, J. A. Grunbaum, and L. Kann
Passive versus Active Parental Permission in School-Based Survey Research: Does the Type of Permission Affect Prevalence Estimates of Risk Behaviors?
Eval Rev, December 1, 2004; 28(6): 564 - 577.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
P. Y. Ji, S. B. Pokorny, and L. A. Jason
Factors Influencing Middle and High Schools' Active Parental Consent Return Rates
Eval Rev, December 1, 2004; 28(6): 578 - 591.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
B. J. McMorris, J. Clements, T. Evans-Whipp, D. Gangnes, L. Bond, J. W. Toumbourou, and R. F. Catalano
A Comparison of Methods to Obtain Active Parental Consent for an International Student Survey
Eval Rev, February 1, 2004; 28(1): 64 - 83.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
J. M. Oakes
Risks and Wrongs in Social Science Research: An Evaluator's Guide to the IRB
Eval Rev, October 1, 2002; 26(5): 443 - 479.
[Abstract] [PDF]