Evaluation Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mazerolle, L. G.
Right arrow Articles by Roehl, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mazerolle, L. G.
Right arrow Articles by Roehl, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Evaluation Review, Vol. 24, No. 2, 212-241 (2000)

Civil Remedies and Drug Control: A Randomized Field Trial in Oakland, California

Lorraine Green Mazerolle

University of Cincinnati

James F. Price

Florida Atlantic University

Jan Roehl

Justice Research Center

This study evaluates the impact of a civil remedy program (Beat Health) on drug and disorder problems under experimental field trial conditions. Using calls for service data, the authors find statistically significant differences between the control and experimental groups, when drug problem calls prior to the start of the intervention were compared to drug calls during a 12-month follow-up period. The Beat Health sites, especially the residential sites, improved relative to the control sites. By contrast, the control treatment (patrol response) led to significant increases in drug problems, particularly at the commercial properties included in this study. The authors also examined the spatial influences of the Beat Health and patrol responses in catchment areas surrounding each of the 100 study sites. The results show some improvement in the experimental residential sites. The authors found, however, a possible displacement of drug problems in and around both the commercial experimental and control sites. They show that the displacement effect is most notable in the commercial control sites.

Key Words: Civil remedies • drug control • calls for service • spatial analysis • police experiments


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Police QuarterlyHome page
L. Mazerolle, D. Soole, and S. Rombouts
Drug Law Enforcement: A Review of the Evaluation Literature
Police Quarterly, June 1, 2007; 10(2): 115 - 153.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
R. Boruch, H. May, H. Turner, J. Lavenberg, A. Petrosino, D. de Moya, J. Grimshaw, and E. Foley
Estimating the Effects of Interventions That are Deployed in Many Places: Place-Randomized Trials
American Behavioral Scientist, January 1, 2004; 47(5): 608 - 633.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social ScienceHome page
A. A. BRAGA
The Effects of Hot Spots Policing on Crime
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, November 1, 2001; 578(1): 104 - 125.
[Abstract] [PDF]