Evaluation Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click Here for More Information

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Killworth, P. D.
Right arrow Articles by Johnsen, E. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Killworth, P. D.
Right arrow Articles by Johnsen, E. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Evaluation Review, Vol. 22, No. 2, 289-308 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9802200205

Estimation of Seroprevalence, Rape, and Homelessness in the United States Using a Social Network Approach

Peter D. Killworth

Southampton Oceanography Centre

Christopher McCarty

University of Florida

H. Russell Bernard

University of Florida

Gene Ann Shelley

Georgia State University

Eugene C. Johnsen

University of California, Santa Barbara

The authors have developed and tested scale-up methods, based on a simple social network theory, to estimate the size of hard-to-count subpopulations. The authors asked a nationally representative sample of respondents how many people they knew in a list of 32 subpopulations, including 29 subpopulations of known size and 3 of unknown size. Using these responses, the authors produced an effectively unbiased maximum likelihood estimate of the number of people each respondent knows. These estimates were then used to back-estimate the size of the three populations of unknown size. Maximum likelihood values and 95% confidence intervals are found for seroprevalence, 800,000 ±43,000; for homeless, 526,000 ±35,000; and for women raped in the last 12 months, 194,000±21,000. The estimate for seroprevalence agrees strikingly with medical estimates, the homeless estimate is well within the published estimates, and the authors' estimate lies in the middle of the published range for rape victims.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eval RevHome page
B. Berry
A Repeated Observation Approach for Estimating the Street Homeless Population
Eval Rev, April 1, 2007; 31(2): 166 - 199.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Sociological Methods ResearchHome page
P. D. Killworth, C. McCarty, E. C. Johnsen, H. R. Bernard, and G. A. Shelley
Investigating the Variation of Personal Network Size Under Unknown Error Conditions
Sociological Methods Research, August 1, 2006; 35(1): 84 - 112.
[Abstract] [PDF]