This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Campbell, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Campbell, J. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

How Consumers/Survivors Are Evaluating the Quality of Psychiatric Care

Missouri Institute of Mental Health

In the past decade, mental health consumers have increasingly become involved in evaluating the quality of psychiatric care and applying sophisticated data strategies to affect system reform. Through multistakeholder partnerships, they have identified outcome indicators, collaborated in the development of a mental health report card, and designed and conducted consumer self- report surveys on satisfaction and needs and preferences for housing and supports. The formation of multistakeholder assessment teams; the definition of the consumer perspective through focus groups and concept-mapping pilots; and research on coercion, personhood, recovery, and empowerment are key activities of consumers/survivors in the field of evaluation.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. L. Marshall, T. P. Crowe, L. G. Oades, F. F. Deane, and D. J. Kavanagh A Review of Consumer Involvement in Evaluations of Case Management: Consistency With a Recovery Paradigm Psychiatr Serv, March 1, 2007; 58(3): 396 - 401. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Tomes The patient as a policy factor: a historical case study of the consumer/survivor movement in mental health. Health Aff., May 1, 2006; 25(3): 720 - 729. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K Canvin, A Bartlett, and V Pinfold Acceptability of compulsory powers in the community: the ethical considerations of mental health service users on Supervised Discharge and Guardianship J. Med. Ethics, August 1, 2005; 31(8): 457 - 462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. C. Ware, T. Tugenberg, and B. Dickey Practitioner Relationships and Quality of Care for Low-Income Persons With Serious Mental Illness Psychiatr Serv, May 1, 2004; 55(5): 555 - 559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. T. Mueser, P. W. Corrigan, D. W. Hilton, B. Tanzman, A. Schaub, S. Gingerich, S. M. Essock, N. Tarrier, B. Morey, S. Vogel-Scibilia, et al. Illness Management and Recovery: A Review of the Research Focus, January 1, 2004; 2(1): 34 - 47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. D. Sullins Adapting the Empowerment Evaluation Model: A Mental Health Drop-in Center Case Example American Journal of Evaluation, September 1, 2003; 24(3): 387 - 398. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. T. Mueser, P. W. Corrigan, D. W. Hilton, B. Tanzman, A. Schaub, S. Gingerich, S. M. Essock, N. Tarrier, B. Morey, S. Vogel-Scibilia, et al. Illness Management and Recovery: A Review of the Research Psychiatr Serv, October 1, 2002; 53(10): 1272 - 1284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. M. Linhorst and A. Eckert Involving People with Severe Mental Illness in Evaluation and Performance Improvement Eval Health Prof, September 1, 2002; 25(3): 284 - 301. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Bickman and M. S. Salzer Introduction: Measuring Quality in Mental Health Services Eval Rev, June 1, 1997; 21(3): 285 - 291. [Abstract] [PDF]