Evaluation Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click Here for More Information

Click here for free access to the SAGE eReference platform!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderton, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Egan, K. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anderton, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Egan, K. L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Evaluation Review, Vol. 21, No. 1, 3-26 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9702100101

Environmental Equity in Superfund

Demographics of the Discovery and Prioritization of Abandoned Toxic Sites

Douglas L. Anderton

University of Massachusetts

John Michael Oakes

University of Massachusetts

Karla L. Egan

University of Massachusetts

This article presents findtngs of the first national tract-level analysis of the distribution of residential characteristics, including the percentage of selected minorities and socioeconomically disadvan taged groups, in relation to uncontrolled toxic waste sites (i. e., CERCLIS and NPL sites). In contrast to prevailing notions, the authors find that uncontrolled toxic waste sites are not disproportionately located in minority neighborhoods or neighborhoods of soctoeconomtcally disadvantaged residents. However, multivariate analyses of site distribution and a hazard regression analysis of the site prioritization process suggest that communities with a higher percentage of Black residents are less likely to receive NPL (National Priorities List) designation, delaying potential remediation. Biases in the prioritization process are, however, substantively small.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Urban StudHome page
L. Schweitzer and M. Stephenson JR
Right Answers, Wrong Questions: Environmental Justice as Urban Research
Urban Stud, February 1, 2007; 44(2): 319 - 337.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Public HealthHome page
M. E. Northridge, G. N. Stover, J. E. Rosenthal, and D. Sherard
Environmental Equity and Health: Understanding Complexity and Moving Forward
Am J Public Health, February 1, 2003; 93(2): 209 - 214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
C. G. Boone and A. Modarres
Creating a Toxic Neighborhood in Los Angeles County: A Historical Examination of Environmental Inequity
Urban Affairs Review, November 1, 1999; 35(2): 163 - 187.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Economic Development QuarterlyHome page
W. M. Bowen
Comments on "'Every Breath You Take... ': The Demographics of Toxic Air Releases in Southern California"
Economic Development Quarterly, May 1, 1999; 13(2): 124 - 134.
[PDF]

Home page
 Economic Development QuarterlyHome page
J. L. Sadd, M. Pastor Jr., J. T. Boer, and L. D. Snyder
Response to Comments by William M. Bowen
Economic Development Quarterly, May 1, 1999; 13(2): 135 - 140.
[PDF]