Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kegan, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kegan, D. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Other

The Cycles Surveys

Longitudinal Indicators of the Quality of Student Life and a Framework for Evaluation and Administrative Experimentation

Daniel L. Kegan

Berkeley, California and Amherst, Massachusetts

A set of quality of student life indicators, the Cycles Survey, is described. It was developed to provide a low cost, quality institutional research program capable of longitudinal re search, continuous broad bandwidth monitoring, and data comparisons with other insti tutions. The development of the 50 questions and the form and format of the survey is pre sented. Test-retest reliabilities of the questions of the survey were found to be good. The Cycles instrument is multidimensional without dominant evaluative, halo, or response- effect factors. Some uses of Cycles data are presented. It is suggested that Cycles surveys will be useful at other colleges and universities, as well as to business, government, and health institutions.

Evaluation Review, Vol. 2, No. 2, 293-314 (1978)
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X7800200207


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?