Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Calsyn, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Klinkenberg, W. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Calsyn, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Klinkenberg, W. D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Response Bias in Needs Assessment Studies

Robert J. Calsyn

University of Missouri-St. Louis

W. Dean Klinkenberg

University of Missouri-St. Louis

Agency awareness estimates provided in the typical needs assessment study are probably inflated by a response set labeled "agency awareness acquiescence. " More specifically, respondents who said that they were aware of one or more fictitious agencies (acquiescers) were more likely to report being aware ofmore "real" agencies than nonacquiescers. Although agency awareness acquiescence was related to the impression management component of social desirability, it was not related to the self-deception component of social desirability or to two acquiescence measures. Women exhibited slightly more agency awareness acquiescence than men. Age, ethnic background, and knowledge of the aging process had no impact on agency awareness acquiescence.

Evaluation Review, Vol. 19, No. 2, 217-225 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9501900206
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
A. Li and J. Bagger
The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR): A Reliability Generalization Study
Educational and Psychological Measurement, June 1, 2007; 67(3): 525 - 544.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Eval RevHome page
R. J. Calsyn, W. L. Kelemen, E. T. Jones, and J. P. Winter
Reducing Overclaiming in Needs Assessment Studies an Experimental Comparison
Eval Rev, December 1, 2001; 25(6): 583 - 604.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Research on AgingHome page
R. J. Calsyn and J. P. Winter
Predicting Specific Service Awareness Dimensions
Research on Aging, November 1, 1999; 21(6): 762 - 780.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Eval RevHome page
R. J. Calsyn and J. P. Winter
Understanding and Controlling Response Bias in Needs Assessment Studies
Eval Rev, August 1, 1999; 23(4): 399 - 417.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 American Behavioral ScientistHome page
P. J. LELAND
Exploring Challenges to Nonprofit Status: Issues of Definition and Access in Community-Based Research
American Behavioral Scientist, March 1, 1996; 39(5): 587 - 601.
[Abstract]