Evaluation Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click Here for More Information

Click here for free access to the SAGE eReference platform!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Syme, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sadler, B. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Syme, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sadler, B. S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Evaluation Review, Vol. 18, No. 5, 523-542 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9401800501

Evaluation of Public Involvement in Water Resources Planning

A Researcher-Practitioner Dialogue

Geoffrey J. Syme

Australian Research Centre for Water in Society CSIRO, Division of Water Resources

Brian S. Sadler

Water Resources Directorate Water Authority of Western Australia

This article identifies evaluation ofdecisions incorporating public involvement as an area where views might differ according to the role of the stakeholder. The two authors have had extensive interaction in a wide variety of public involvement programs related to water resources, but from the differing perspectives of research and practice. Because of increasing public interest in quality public involvement programs, evaluation has a high priority for both authors. Based on theory and experience, six general criteria that are seen by both researcher and practitioner as requirements for adequate evaluation are presented in the context of a brief case study.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Science Technology Human ValuesHome page
G. Rowe and L. J. Frewer
Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises: A Research Agenda
Science Technology Human Values, October 1, 2004; 29(4): 512 - 556.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
J. Strobl and N. Bruce
Achieving wider participation in strategic health planning: experience from the consultation phase of Liverpool's City Health Plan'
Health Promot. Int., September 1, 2000; 15(3): 215 - 225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]