Evaluation Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click Here for More Information

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dynarski, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dynarski, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Evaluation Review, Vol. 17, No. 1, 47-59 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9301700104

The Effects of Displacement On Measures of Reemployment Bonus Impacts

Mark Dynarski

Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.

Evaluations of the impacts of government employment and training programs on workers have generally followed a strategy whereby the labor market outcomes of workers who receive program services are compared with the outcomes of workers who do not receive program services. Differences in outcomes are then attributed to the effects of receiving services. This article examines the problem of measuring the impacts of reemployment bonuses when treatment group members and control group members interact in the labor market. It is shown that the conventional measure of bonus impacts — the difference in average time spent unemployed of the treatment group and control group — may significantly overestimate the net impact of the bonus offer, and that measuring the net impact correctly requires the presence of another control group that is not affected by the bonus program. It is also shown that measured impacts from previous bonus experiments may have been due entirely to displacement, but the designs of these experiments were not statistically adequate to detect displacement. The implication is that the results of previous bonus experiments should be treated with considerable caution.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?