Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Martin, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Assessment of S-Night Street Enumeration in the 1990 Census

Elizabeth Martin

U.S. Bureau of the Census

On March 20-21,1990, the Census Bureau conducted "Shelterand Street Night to count people in emergency shelters and street locations. Observers were placed in a sample of street sites in five cities to report on the census enumeration process. Comparison of observer reports with census returns indicates that street enumeration was not carried out in a comparable, standardized way in the five cities. The main operational problems were enumerator failure to enumerate some sites and selectivity in approaching people within sites. Variability in how the operation was carried out reduces the comparability of street counts from place to place. The results also indicate that observer reports were not always reliable, particularly in large or complex sites with impediments to observation.

Evaluation Review, Vol. 16, No. 4, 418-438 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9201600407


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eval RevHome page
B. Berry
A Repeated Observation Approach for Estimating the Street Homeless Population
Eval Rev, April 1, 2007; 31(2): 166 - 199.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
C. R. Farrell
Sharing Neighborhoods: Order and Disorder in Homeless-Domiciled Encounters
American Behavioral Scientist, April 1, 2005; 48(8): 1033 - 1054.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
G. C. SUMNER, R. M. ANDERSEN, S. L. WENZEL, and L. GELBERG
Weighting for Period Perspective in Samples of the Homeless
American Behavioral Scientist, September 1, 2001; 45(1): 80 - 104.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
P. Koegel, M. A. Burnam, and S. C. Morton
Enumerating Homeless People: Alternative Strategies and Their Consequences
Eval Rev, August 1, 1996; 20(4): 378 - 403.
[Abstract] [PDF]