Evaluation Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click Here for More Information

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hopper, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hopper, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Evaluation Review, Vol. 16, No. 4, 376-388 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9201600403

Counting the Homeless

S-Night in New York

Kim Hopper

Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research

A modified capture-recapture methodology was devised to monitor and assess the 1990 S-Night street count in lower Manhattan. Observers were deployed at 41 sites, selected in a quasi-random manner, from the list provided of "predesignated" street sites. Such "plants" were situated similarly to the street-dwelling homeless and should themselves have been counted Results suggest that Census Bureau enumeration of homeless people in such sites fell short of a full count. Problems included the difficulty of counting sleeping people hidden from view; the incomplete listing of sites where homeless people congregate; faulty coverage at the sites visited by Bureau enumerators; the apparent failure of enumerators to visit many of the smaller sites; and the evident reluctance of some enumerators to follow Census Bureau procedures. Attitudes of the homeless poor themselves were not a problem. Implications are drawn for alternative methods of enumeration.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
K. Hopper, M. Shinn, E. Laska, M. Meisner, and J. Wanderling
Estimating Numbers of Unsheltered Homeless People Through Plant-Capture and Postcount Survey Methods
Am J Public Health, August 1, 2008; 98(8): 1438 - 1442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
B. Berry
A Repeated Observation Approach for Estimating the Street Homeless Population
Eval Rev, April 1, 2007; 31(2): 166 - 199.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
P. Koegel, M. A. Burnam, and S. C. Morton
Enumerating Homeless People: Alternative Strategies and Their Consequences
Eval Rev, August 1, 1996; 20(4): 378 - 403.
[Abstract] [PDF]