This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tebes, J. K. Articles by Arthur, M. W. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Tebes, J. K. Articles by Arthur, M. W. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Panel Attrition and External Validity in the Short-Term Follow-Up Study of Adolescent Substance Use

Yale University

David L. Snow

Yale University

Michael W. Arthur

Yale University

The present study examines the relationship among grade, substance assessed; and type of measurement and statistical analysis employed in the detection of external validity threats due to panel attrition in the modal follow-up study found in adolescent substance use research. Six successive 2-year panel samples are examined The results indicate that dropouts demonstrate significantly higher baseline mean use of licit (tobacco and alcohol) and illicit (marijuana and hard drugs) substances when ANOVA is used, but only higher baseline use of illicit substances when chi-square analyses are used In addition, although mean use tests are no more sensitive to the increased variation in substance use that occurs during adolescence, they are more likely to reveal differences between dropouts and stayers in baseline use of licit substances. The results indicate (a) that findings from school-based, longitudinal studies almost certainly underestimate the level and extent ofsubstance use among adolescents; and (b) that alternative types of attrition analyses yield different effects regardless of grade, even in the short-term follow-up study. These findings are discussed for their implications to adolescent substance use research and for the establishment of standardized procedures to consider the relative risk of Type 2 to Type 1 error in attrition analyses.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Zand, N. R. Thomson, M. Dugan, J. A. Braun, P. Holterman-Hommes, and P. L. Hunter Predictors of retention in an alcohol, tobacco, and other drug prevention study. Eval Rev, April 1, 2006; 30(2): 209 - 222. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. M. Rohe and V. Basolo Long-Term Effects of Homeownership on the Self-Perceptions and Social Interaction of Low-Income Persons Environment and Behavior, November 1, 1997; 29(6): 793 - 819. [Abstract]

				J. K. Tebes, D. L. Snow, T. S. Ayers, and M. W. Arthur Panel Accretion and External Validity in Adolescent Substance Use Research Eval Rev, August 1, 1996; 20(4): 470 - 484. [Abstract] [PDF]