Evaluation Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click Here for More Information

Click here for free access to the SAGE eReference platform!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clark, W. A.V.
Right arrow Articles by Morrison, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Clark, W. A.V.
Right arrow Articles by Morrison, P. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Evaluation Review, Vol. 15, No. 6, 712-726 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9101500603

Demographic Paradoxes in the Los Angeles Voting Rights Case

William A.V. Clark

University of Calcfornca, Los Angeles

Peter A. Morrison

RAND Corporatcon

As local jurisdictions redistrict in the 1990s, those with a complex demographic mosaic like Los Angeles County's must exercise particular care in fulfilling three legal obligations: first, to protect the voting power of citizens; second, to ensure equal representation for equal numbers of persons; and third, to avoid diluting the voting strength of a protected group. Courts draw on demographic analysis to quantify these legal standards. This article illustrates how such analysis can inform -and potentially confuse -judicial review in Section 2 voting rights claims. In Los Angeles County, efforts to enhance the voting strength of Hispanics risk an equal protection challenge by minority and nonminority citizens in the remaining districts, whose votes get devalued. Demographic analysis exposes potential limitations in using "total population" as the apportionment base and is essential in gauging the actual compactness of a jurisdiction's minority voters.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eval RevHome page
D. A. Freedman, S. P. Klein, J. Sacks, C. A. Smyth, and C. G. Everett
Ecological Regression and Voting Rights
Eval Rev, December 1, 1991; 15(6): 673 - 711.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
B. Grofman
Statistics Without Substance: A Critique of Freedman et al. and Clark and Morrison
Eval Rev, December 1, 1991; 15(6): 746 - 769.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
D. A. Freedman, S. P. Klein, J. Sacks, C. A. Smyth, and C. G. Everett
Rejoinder
Eval Rev, December 1, 1991; 15(6): 800 - 816.
[PDF]