This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Race, K. E.H. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Race, K. E.H. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Treatment Fidelity Among Evaluated and Nonevaluated Workplace Safety-Belt Programs

National Safety Council

To explore the treatment fidelity of employee safety-belt programs, 614 companies and organizations were divided into two groups: those that had conducted an evaluation of their program ( n₁ = 183) and those that had not (n₂ = 431 ). Scores based on equally weighted program elements were computed and then analyzed by a simple multiple regression model. Present results showed that evaluation-active companies and organizations offer more extensive programs, which tend to include an expanded belt-use policy, more education activities, an incentive component, and active management support. The need for future evaluation research and program theory to identify essential program components is then discussed.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?