Evaluation Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click Here for More Information

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hennessy, M.
Right arrow Articles by Saltz, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hennessy, M.
Right arrow Articles by Saltz, R. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Evaluation Review, Vol. 13, No. 4, 380-399 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8901300403

Adjusting for Multimethod Bias Through Selection Modeling

Michael Hennessy

Prevention Research Center

Robert F. Saltz

Prevention Research Center

This article presents results of a beverage server intervention project that attempted to reduce levels of alcoholic intoxication through a set of policy changes and server training. Outcome data were collected through the use of personal interviews and structured observations in two enlisted clubs, one receiving the intervention and one acting as the comparison group. Because of the logistics of the data collection, the pooled sample of observations and interviews reflects systematic method biases as well as self-selection effects. Probit regression to model method and self-selection biases is used to adjust for these two biases in the analysis of consumption measures for total alcoholic drinks, beers, and blood alcohol concentration.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eval RevHome page
A. J. Treno and H. D. Holder
Community Mobilization, Organizing, and Media Advocacy: A Discussion of Methodological Issues
Eval Rev, April 1, 1997; 21(2): 166 - 190.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
R. F. Saltz
Evaluating Specific Community Structural Changes: Examples From the Assessment of Responsible Beverage Service
Eval Rev, April 1, 1997; 21(2): 246 - 267.
[Abstract] [PDF]