This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dennis, M. L. Articles by Boruch, R. F. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Dennis, M. L. Articles by Boruch, R. F. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Randomized Experiments for Planning and Testing Projects in Developing Countries

Threshold Conditions

Research Triangle Institute

Robert F. Boruch

Northwestern University

Increased use of randomized experiments to evaluate social programs throughout the world has been a major advance in evaluation research. This article focuses on determining which program evaluations are appropriate or feasible for randomized experiments. These threshold conditions include: (1) the present practice must need improvement; (2) the efficacy of the proposed intervention(s) must be uncertain; (3) there should be no simpler alternatives; (4) the results must be potentially important for policy; and (5) the design must meet the ethical standards of both the researchers and the service providers. To illustrate the issues involved and examine some of the innovative research designs for addressing them, experiments from Barbados, China, Colombia, Kenya, India, Israel, Nicaragua, Pakistan, Taiwan, and the U.S. are reviewed.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Bamberger The Evaluation of International Development Programs: A View from the Front American Journal of Evaluation, March 1, 2000; 21(1): 95 - 102. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. S. Aiken, S. G. West, D. E. Schwalm, J. L. Carroll, and S. Hsiung Comparison of a Randomized and Two Quasi-Experimental Designs in a Single Outcome Evaluation: Efficacy of a University-Level Remedial Writing Program Eval Rev, April 1, 1998; 22(2): 207 - 244. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. C. Rebien Development Assistance Evaluation and the Foundations of Program Evaluation Eval Rev, August 1, 1997; 21(4): 438 - 460. [Abstract] [PDF]