Evaluation Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click Here for More Information

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hser, Y.-I.
Right arrow Articles by Chou, C.-P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hser, Y.-I.
Right arrow Articles by Chou, C.-P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Evaluation Review, Vol. 12, No. 5, 547-570 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8801200505

Evaluation of Drug Abuse Treatment

A Repeated Measures Design Assessing Methadone Maintenance

Yih-Ing Hser

University of California, Los Angeles

M. Douglas Anglin

University of California, Los Angeles

Chih-Ping Chou

University of California, Los Angeles

The present study utilizes a repeated measures design to evaluate methadone maintenance (MM) treatment effects. The addiction history of MM clients was examined from the beginning of daily narcotic use to the date of interview and was aggregated into the following three time periods: (1) a relatively long pretreatment baseline, (2) all time periods while in treatment, and (3) all time periods not in treatment after the initial treatment entry. These three time periods reflect treatment statuses before, on, and off treatment, respectively. Multiple measures were taken during each treatment status for a sample of 720 MM clients with heterogeneous background characteristics. A repeated measures analysis of variance was conducted for each measure, treating treatment status as the repeated factor, or within-subject variable, and sex, ethnicity, and treatment duration ratio as three between-subject variables. Overall, compared to pretreatment measures, results showed significant improvement for both postadmission statuses: in treatment and not in treatment. Amount of improvement was affected by sex, ethnicity and treatment duration ratio. Findings suggest that MM treatment is an effective intervention, that retention needs to be improved for chronic heroin addicts, and that consideration must be given to client characteristics in assessing treatment effects.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eval RevHome page
K. I. Powers and M. D. Anglin
A Differential Assessment of the Cumulative Versus Stabilizing Effect of Methadone Maintenance Treatment
Eval Rev, April 1, 1998; 22(2): 175 - 206.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
K. I. Powers and M. D. Anglin
Cumulative Versus Stabilizing Effects of Methadone Maintenance: A Quasi-Experimental Study Using Longitudinal Self-Report Data
Eval Rev, June 1, 1993; 17(3): 243 - 270.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social ScienceHome page
M. D. ANGLIN and T. H. MAUGH II
Ensuring Success in Interventions with Drug-Using Offenders
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, May 1, 1992; 521(1): 66 - 90.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
M. D. Anglin and K. I. Powers
Methadone Treatment and Legal Supervision: Individual and Joint Effects on the Behavior of Narcotics Addicts
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, December 1, 1991; 27(4): 515 - 531.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
L. S. Aiken and S. G. West
Invalidity of True Experiments: Self-Report Pretest Biases
Eval Rev, August 1, 1990; 14(4): 374 - 390.
[Abstract] [PDF]