Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Calloway, M.
Right arrow Articles by Belyea, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Calloway, M.
Right arrow Articles by Belyea, M. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Other

Ensuring Validity Using Coworker Samples

A Situationally Driven Approach

Michael Calloway

Noel Dunivant & Associates

Michael J. Belyea

Durham Veterans Administration Medical Center and Duke University

In program evaluation, limitations often preclude the utilization of sophisticated methodologies that assure the integrity of research findings. When rigorous method ologies are not applicable, theoretical or situationally driven evaluations have been developed. In such cases, the situation itself can serve as a useful research guide. In a study of a managerial training program, two subsamples of coworkers—supervisors and subordinates—were used to validate the participants' assessments of program impact. Both samples supported in direction and magnitude the participants' assessments. In addition, the subsamples separately revealed a similar ability to judge specific as well as overall impact. The methodology strengthened the validity of the findings.

Evaluation Review, Vol. 12, No. 2, 186-195 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8801200205
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?