Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shadish, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by Epstein, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Shadish, W. R., JR
Right arrow Articles by Epstein, R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Patterns of Program Evaluation Practice Among Members of the Evaluation Research Society and Evaluation Network

William R. Shadish, JR

Memphis State University

Roberta Epstein

Memphis State University

Using stratified random sampling of the membership directories of the Evaluation Network and the Evaluation Research Society, we surveyed the practices of program evaluators. Those practices factored into four patterns—academic evaluation, stakeholder service evaluation, decision-driven evaluation, and outcome evaluation. The patterns were differentially related to such factors as disciplinary background, organizational setting, and evaluation theory.

Evaluation Review, Vol. 11, No. 5, 555-590 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8701100501
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 American Journal of EvaluationHome page
J. Cartland, H. S. Ruch-Ross, M. Mason, and W. Donohue
Role Sharing Between Evaluators and Stakeholders in Practice
American Journal of Evaluation, December 1, 2008; 29(4): 460 - 477.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 American Journal of EvaluationHome page
J. D. Dewey, B. E. Montrosse, D. C. Schroter, C. D. Sullins, and J. R. Mattox II
Evaluator Competencies: What's Taught Versus What's Sought
American Journal of Evaluation, September 1, 2008; 29(3): 268 - 287.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Health Educ ResHome page
E. L. James, C. Fraser, K. Anderson, and F. Judd
Use of research by the Australian health promotion workforce
Health Educ. Res., August 1, 2007; 22(4): 576 - 587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 EvaluationHome page
M. Demarteau
A Theoretical Framework and Grid for Analysis of Programme-evaluation Practices
Evaluation, October 1, 2002; 8(4): 454 - 473.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 EvaluationHome page
X. Ballart
Spanish Evaluation Practice Versus Program Evaluation Theory: Cases from Five Policy Areas
Evaluation, April 1, 1998; 4(2): 149 - 170.
[Abstract] [PDF]