Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Matulef, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Matulef, M. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Target Efficiency of State Home Ownership Programs

Mark Lewis Matulef

National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials, Washington, DC

The United States government has promoted home ownership for over 50 years. The U. S. tax code provides a tax exemption on income earned on state and local mortgage revenue bonds issued to finance home ownership subsidy programs. The president's tax proposals to Congress would eliminate federally tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds (MRBs). A total of 45 state housing finance agencies (HFAs) issue MRBs and impose income limits on program participants even without a federal requirement to do so. In 1983, a U.S. General Accounting Office report concluded that most MRB-financed single-family housing programs aided higher-income households in the majority. This author's study found, however, that the majority of assistance went to low- and moderate-income households. One-third of the HFAs did provide a majority of assistance to higher-income households. The study conducted for this article determined that the income limit imposed on program participants was an effective control on the degree to which low- and moderate-income households were program beneficiaries. The existence of legislative and executive oversight powers did not, however, have a significant impact on single-family program performance. National income limits or income-limit guidelines could result in greater target efficiency in home ownership programs.

Evaluation Review, Vol. 10, No. 6, 715-756 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8601000601


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?