Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tonn, B.
Right arrow Articles by Hirst, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tonn, B.
Right arrow Articles by Hirst, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Lowering the Costs of Program Evaluation

Energy Conservation Programs in the Pacific Northwest

Bruce Tonn

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Eric Hirst

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

During this period of reductions in government social programs, there is great value in developing program evaluation methods that are low cost and timely. This article explores the use of past evaluation data to develop statistical models useful in predicting future program performance. Model data requirements are much lower than those of evaluations, and models can yield policy results much more quickly. The modeling approach is used to develop a low-cost monitoring scheme for the Bonneville Power Administration Residential Weatherization Program. Three years of evaluation data (1981, 1982, and 1983) were utilized. The results suggest that the modeling approach is most effective when program characteristics and actors, and the external environment are stable over time. In our application, modeling results changed between 1982 and 1983. The article concludes with a discussion about the defensibility ofpredictions yielded by streamlined evaluations.

Evaluation Review, Vol. 10, No. 3, 335-353 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8601000305


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?