Evaluation Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click Here for More Information

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blomberg, T. G.
Right arrow Articles by Ezell, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Blomberg, T. G.
Right arrow Articles by Ezell, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Evaluation Review, Vol. 10, No. 1, 45-64 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8601000103

Diversion and Net Widening

A Cost-Savings Assessment

Thomas G. Blomberg

Florida State University

Gary R. Heald

Florida State University

Mark Ezell

Florida State University

Among the rationales used in promoting juvenile diversion is cost savings. This rationale is based on the assumption that diversion handling is less expensive than formal justice processing and that diversion reduces the number of cases handled by the formal system. To date, the few available results concerning diversion's cost savings are fragmented and inconclusive. Although diversion handling has been found to be less costly, it has also been shown that diversion increases the overall number of youth subject to court supervision and control. Diversion's capacity to "widen the net " has been ignored in previous cost studies. This article assesses the feasible cost savings associated with statewide imple mentation of diversionary arbitration programs in Florida and includes consideration of the programs' capacities to wide the client net.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?