Evaluation Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click Here for More Information

Click here for free access to the SAGE eReference platform!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Magidson, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Magidson, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Evaluation Review, Vol. 1, No. 3, 399-420 (1977)
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X7700100303

Toward a Causal Model Approach for Adjusting for Preexisting Differences in the Nonequivalent Control Group Situation

A General Alternative to ANCOVA

Jay Magidson

Abt Associates, Inc.

The traditional approach for partialing out the effects of confounding factors in a non equivalent control group situation is to calculate a partial correlation coefficient or a (partial) regression coefficient controlling for one or more "covariates." Since the covariates generally are imperfect measures of the factors, this procedure will typically yield biased estimates of effect. An alternative approach, which allows for the presence of measurement error, is discussed and applied to some data from the original Head Start evaluation. Contrary to the original analysis, which found the Head Start program to be totally ineffective, the alternative approach yields small positive estimates of effect. The resulting model is conceptually feasible and fits the data well. However, it is only one of many possible causal models which could have been formulated. Guidelines are needed for building causal models in the evaluation research framework when little is known a priori regarding the causal relationships.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?